What specific sections or information seemed particularly relevant to your current professional development?
I was recently hired as a Community and Parent Engagement Coordinator for DC Public Schools Office of Early Childhood Development. One of my roles will be to organize parent workshops on child development and best practices for school readiness for their preschool aged children. As I read through the material found on the Harlem Children’s Zone website I came across one of their newsletters, Harlem Children’s Zone a Look Inside, and a featured article that will be especially useful for me in my new role and thus my professional development. The article entitled Baby Collage gives the following description:
The Baby College is a program of the Harlem Children’s Zone. Its goal is to provide everyone in the Harlem Children’s Zone who is expecting a child or raising children between the ages of 0 and 3 with the information and support necessary to bring up happy and healthy children who enter school ready to learn. Classes are held on Saturday mornings at a local public school, and all services are free. Participants receive breakfast, lunch, incentives, and child care during the nine week course, which covers a broad range of subjects including brain development, discipline, immunization, safety, asthma, lead poisoning, parental stress, and parent-child bonding. The program, which began in 2000, now has three full cycles per year, each with more than 50 graduates.
This program sounds very impressive and something I would like to use as a model for the parent workshops I organize. I especially like the topics covered in the nine-week course and can see how I would easily be able to include my background of early trauma and toxic stress and its impact on brain development as part of the course offerings for my parents.
Which idea/statements/resources either on the website or in an e-newsletter, did you fine controversial or made you think about an issue in new ways?
I ran across a position paper entitled: Focusing on Results in Promise Neighborhood. Essentially the article makes the case for the expansion of the Harlem Children‘s Zone model through a federal initiative called promise neighborhoods. While reading the position paper I did run across several statements that raised red flags or may be controversial. The two statements are in regard to why the HCZ model has been so successful and read:
-Measurements Matters: Measurable goals are identified that are clearly sated, meaningful and ambitious
-Data Matters: Data systems are in place, with the capacity to capture, store and access data for community-planning, decision making and accountability.
On the surface these statements seem harmless, and in fact noteworthy; however with the current Standards Movement and high stakes testing taking place within the field in education, such statements should make EC professional pause. We learned in this week’s discussion topic on new voices in the field of early childhood, that along with the additional resources these voices bring to the field, there are also unintended consequences these voices bring as well. An over emphasis on results and lead to those developmentally appropriate practices such as play and child centered curriculum becoming the victims to data an measurable goals.
What information does this website or e-newsletter contain that adds to your understanding of how economist, neuroscientist or politicians support the early childhood field?
It was very apparent by reading through their 2008-2000 biannual report entitled, Harlem Children’s Zone: Investing in Success, that their model has been heavily supported by economist, scientist and politicians. For example, I read the following:
The respected Dr. Roland Fryers studied the achievement of the Promise students comparing their statewide test scores to those students who did not win the school’s admission lottery. He went further and compared their statewide test scores to those students who did not win the school’s admission lottery. He declared that some grades had closed the black-white achievement gap and his finding had in his words, changed my life as a scientist.
The HCZ model has been supported and influence by neuroscientist in that the center’s Baby College, which offers early childhood development classes to expecting mothers, was largely created in response to the research coined by neuroscientist on how critical the first five years are for the healthy development of the brain and its functions.
I also observed the support and influence of policymakers/politicians. I read how HCZ had become so successful that now the Obama Administration plans to replicate the model through 20 Promise Neighborhoods over the next 10 years.
What other new insights about issues and trends in the early childhood field di you gain from exploring the website or e-news letter?
During my reading of the HCZ website I also gleaned that there was a big emphasis placed on meeting the needs of the community in order to meet the needs of the students enrolled in their schools. The HCZ model takes on a whole approach model to child development, by offering a range of social services programs, such as medical and dental, mental health, along with advice to parents on how to find housing to filing taxes. The founders believe in large part that their success is directly linked to these additional services. I wonder if this will become a trend in our nation’s public schools, particularly those schools that have large populations living below the poverty line. Only time will tell!

